Home - Published Issues - Volume 15 (2024) Issue 1 - Andrew Schenck
CALL FOR PAPERS: Manuscripts in English, German, French or Spanish on linguistics and/or language teaching are cordially invited for submission
Home - Published Issues - Volume 15 (2024) Issue 1 - Andrew Schenck
Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching 15 (2024) 1, 51-77 (PDF)
Although Form-Focused Instruction (FFI) has been extensively investigated, the degree to which grammatical difficulty impacts input-based and output-based FFI approaches has yet to be well defined in an English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context. To address the need for further research, 36 experimental studies were selected for metanalysis (18 studies with Korean EFL learners and 18 studies with Persian EFL learners). The effects of the type of instruction (input vs. output) were analysed along with other variables that may affect acquisition (complexity of a target feature and L1). The results suggested that input-based instruction was more effective for smaller phrasal features, while output-based instruction was more effective for features with more complex clauses (e.g., relative clauses or conditionals). Regarding the L1, output-based emphasis of collocations was more effective with Persian EFL learners, whose L1 shares more morphosyntactic similarities with English. Collectively, both L1 and L2 may determine the efficacy of FFI.
Form-focused instruction, EFL, grammar, Korean, Persian
Andrew Schenck, Ph.D
Assistant Professor
Department of English
Fort Hays State University, Kansas
Email: adschenck(at)fhsu.edu